I developed a workshop many years ago to help participants consider what policy and collective actions they could take to prevent sexual violence and domestic violence. We assigned groups of audience members to be part of different groups where they brainstormed what policies and actions these groups could do to prevent violence. The groups included “Educators”, “Business Owners”, “The Media”, “Faith Leaders”, and an association that I made up called the “National Association of Bystanders.”
Last week, I think I actually stumbled into that group of bystanders. Actually I think it should be called a group of bystander activists. At the Bystander Intervention: From its roots to the road ahead Conference in Boston, MA, I had the opportunity to learn from and share with hundreds of bystander intervention advocates from all over the world to examine where the work has been and where is bystander intervention going in the future.
Bystander intervention is a hot topic right now in sexual violence and domestic violence prevention. Last year, the journal Violence Against Women released an entire issue of bystander research. The are books on the topic like Alan Berkowitz‘s Response Ability. There is an eLearning unit on engaging bystanders from NEARI aand National Sexual Violence Resource Center. There are many great programs being implemented throughout the country including Mentors in Violence Prevention (who organized this conference), Green Dot, Coaching Boys into Men, and more. I just saw that Start Strong Boston and Futures without Violence released a workshop guide Moving from a Relationship Bystander to a Relationship UPSTANDER. (Check out bystander intervention on the PreventConnect wiki for more resources.)
The conference began with Richard Freeland describing bystander intervention as the revolutionary third way to prevent sexual and domestic violence. Instead of being potential victims or potential perpetrators, the audience are potential bystanders. Leah Aldridge described being an active bystander means that one becomes a social change agent who is part of the solution. Many of the speakers described the social justice framework of Mentors in Violence Preventin (MVP) programs.
Here are just a few more of my highlights:

  • Jackson Katz challenged the notion that “if it help one person it is worth it.” I it helps only one person, it probably is not a good allocation of resources to prevent the problem. He highlighted that we need to make systematic changes.
  • Debra Robbin from Jane Doe, Inc. gave thoughtful consideration to how we have to find new ways to talk about gender inclusivity
  • Ron Slaby identified 3 key ingredients of bystander intervention program: (1) develop a bystander perspective using concrete examples (2) develop bystander efficacy beliefs so people believe that they can make a difference (3) practice bystander intervention actions in advance
  • Richard Lapchick inspired me (and the entire audience) with his stories aboutthe power of sports to transform society.
  • Dorothy Edwards of Green Dot, gave advice on getting funding including “have an excellent program. Don’t suck.”
  • Vicki Banyard talked about some of the bystander intervention research she is working on. There are some exciting new findings that will be coming out in the next few years.
  • Great tweets using the hashtag #MVPConference2012 – thanks to @sjlaskey @ems_healthyu @sacchipatlel @trinid4 @sethavakia @DonMcPherson @PaulAng44 @Graham_vru @rippleofhope @StopItNow

Soon I will have some podcasts from interviews I conducted at the conference. I was great to meet in person so many PreventConnect community members I knew only online.
If you were there, what were your impressions of the conference?